- Home
- Documents
*Mu Tau in Abelian and Non-Abelian Flavor Symmetry Models ... avor symmetries: a continuous Abelian...*

prev

next

out of 35

View

0Download

0

Embed Size (px)

ULB-TH/14-17

Higgs → µτ in Abelian and Non-Abelian Flavor Symmetry Models

Julian Heeck1(a,b), Martin Holthausen2(a), Werner Rodejohann3(a), Yusuke Shimizu4(a)

(a) Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

(b) Service de Physique Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Boulevard du Triomphe, CP225, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

We study lepton flavor violating Higgs decays in two models, with the recently found hint

for Higgs→ µτ at CMS as a benchmark value for the branching ratio. The first model uses the discrete flavor symmetry group A4, broken at the electroweak scale, while the second

is renormalizable and based on the Abelian gauge group Lµ −Lτ . Within the models we find characteristic predictions for other non-standard Higgs decay modes, charged lepton

flavor violating decays and correlations of the branching ratios with neutrino oscillation

parameters.

1julian.heeck@ulb.ac.be 2martin.holthausen@mpi-hd.mpg.de 3werner.rodejohann@mpi-hd.mpg.de 4yusuke.shimizu@mpi-hd.mpg.de

ar X

iv :1

41 2.

36 71

v2 [

he p-

ph ]

2 8

A pr

2 01

5

1 Introduction

After the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012 [1; 2], the obvious next step is to check whether

the new particle behaves exactly as predicted by the Standard Model (SM). Expectations for

departure from SM behavior are based on the fact that a variety of new physics scenarios can

cause deviations. In particular in light of flavor symmetries, which seem necessary to explain

the peculiar structure of lepton mixing, one expects non-trivial Higgs decays, be it unusual

decays in SM particles or in new particles, see e.g. Refs. [3–6]. A particularly interesting

possible departure from the Higgs standard properties is flavor violation in its decays [7; 8].

Indeed, in the first direct search for lepton flavor violating (LFV) Higgs decays, the CMS

collaboration has recently reported on an interesting hint for a non-zero branching ratio [9],

namely

BR(h→ µτ) = ( 0.89+0.40−0.37

) % . (1.1)

Translated into Yukawa couplings defined by the Lagrangian

−LY = yµτµLτRh+ yτµτLµRh+ h.c., (1.2)

with decay rate Γ(h→ µτ) = (|yµτ |2 + |yτµ|2)mh/8π , one needs to explain values around√ |yµτ |2 + |yτµ|2 ' 0.0027± 0.0006 . (1.3)

Though (1.1) represents only a 2.5σ effect, the measurement has caused some attention [10–

14]. While the signal in Eq. (1.1) is not unlikely a statistical fluctuation, it is surely tempting

to apply flavor symmetry models to the branching ratio given above, to study the necessary

structure of models that can generate it, and to investigate other testable consequences of

such models. At least it demonstrates again that some flavor symmetry models have testable

consequences outside the purely leptonic sector, and that precision studies of the Higgs particle

can put constraints on such models. In this paper we show that the signal in Eq. (1.1) can be

generated in two different approaches based on quite different flavor symmetries: a continuous

Abelian approach and a more often studied non-Abelian discrete Ansatz.

It is clear that in order to enforce non-standard Higgs phenomenology one needs to in-

troduce new physics around the electroweak scale. The Higgs could also be the member of a

larger multiplet of states. These aspects occur frequently in flavor symmetry or other mod-

els, and in particular in one of the approaches that we follow. Our first model applies the

frequently used non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetry group A4, broken at the electroweak

scale,1 and features the Higgs particle as a member of a scalar A4 triplet. The second approach

gauges the difference between muon and tau flavor, Lµ − Lτ , and is therefore an anomaly- free Abelian gauge symmetry. Both models have in common that there are additional Higgs

doublets with non-trivial and specific Yukawa coupling structure. They are distinguishable

and falsifiable. We demonstrate that charged lepton flavor violation bounds are fulfilled: the

model based on gauged Lµ − Lτ is broken in such a way that only the µτ sector is affected, 1As usual, the discrete symmetry group is broken in different directions at different scales. The “visible”

breaking takes place at the electroweak scale. For colliders, the neutrino masses are irrelevant and the other

breaking is therefore “invisible”.

2

where constraints are in general weaker than in decays involving electrons. The A4 model

benefits essentially from a residual Z3 symmetry that survives the A4 breaking, sometimes

known as triality [15]. However, its breaking causes in particular the decay µ→ eγ, inducing constraints on the model. Anomalous Higgs decays other than h → µτ are predicted, most noteworthy h → eτ , whose testable correlations with h → µτ are governed by the model parameters. As the breaking of the respective flavor symmetry also generates lepton mixing,

we investigate the impact of the Higgs branching ratios on observables in the neutrino sector.

For example, the Abelian model links the chiral nature of the leptons in the h → µτ decays with the octant of θ23 and the neutrino mass ordering.

In what follows we first deal with the non-Abelian model based on A4 (Sec. 2), before

turning to the Abelian model in Sec. 3. We summarize our results in Sec. 4.

2 Non-Abelian case: An A4 example

Non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries have been used to account for the large mixing angles

measured in the lepton sector [16; 17]. The symmetry A4 is the smallest discrete group with

a 3-dimensional representation [18–23] and is therefore an economic and popular choice given

the three generations of leptons in the SM. In typical models the discrete symmetry is broken

to non-commuting subgroups, which form remnant symmetries of the charged lepton and

neutrino mass matrices [24–26]. In the vast majority of models the breaking of the flavor

symmetry happens at very high and untestable scales.

Here we aim to employ non-Abelian discrete symmetries with a slightly different point

of view, namely we want to emphasize the possibility of additional phenomenology of non-

Abelian flavor symmetries at the electroweak scale [3; 5; 15; 18; 27–36]. Thus, instead of only

concentrating on predicting mixing angles, we have additional tests of models at our disposal,

e.g. lepton flavor violation in the Higgs sector.

Related to this topic there are two aspects of non-Abelian discrete symmetries that are

worth pointing out: first, embedding the SM Higgs in a multiplet of Higgs fields allows one to

predict the Yukawa couplings of the additional Higgs fields. We will put electroweak scalar

doublets into an A4 triplet, which then automatically induces LFV Higgs phenomenology.

Second, the often occurring possibility that breaking of A4 results in a remaining Z3 subgroup

– which helps obeying charged lepton flavor violating bounds – is also of use to us.

To make the presentation self-contained, we first remind the reader about ’lepton trial-

ity’ [15] and then discuss our model and the resulting phenomenology.

2.1 Lepton triality in A4 models

We here describe lepton triality [15], i.e. the Z3 subgroup typically conserved in the charged

lepton sector of A4 models where the Higgs transforms as a triplet 3 under A4. The discrete

symmetry group A4 is the smallest group containing an irreducible 3-dimensional represen-

3

` eR µR τR χ Φ ξ

A4 3 11 13 12 3 3 11

Z4 i i i i 1 −1 −1 SU(2)L 2 1 1 1 2 1 1

U(1)Y −1/2 −1 −1 −1 1/2 0 0

Table 1: Particle content of the minimal model that realizes flavor symmetry breaking at the electroweak

scale, which may be UV completed in the fashion of Ref. [35]. The flavon χ contains the Higgs field and ties

the electroweak to the flavor breaking scale.

tation; we use the basis

ρ(S) =

1 0 00 −1 0 0 0 −1

, ρ(T ) = 0 1 00 0 1

1 0 0

(2.1) and implement a model describing the lepton sector at the electroweak scale, following Refs. [3;

5; 15; 18; 27–36], only caring about the charged lepton sector for now. The particle content

is given in Tab. 1. The necessary vacuum configuration for χ ≡ (χ1, χ2, χ3)T ∼ 3,

〈χi〉 = (

0 v√ 6

) , i = 1, 2, 3, (2.2)

can be naturally obtained from the most general scalar potential following the discussion in

Ref. [36]. Obviously these fields break the discrete symmetry group A4 down to the subgroup〈 T |T 3 = E

〉 ∼= Z3, while simultaneously breaking the electroweak gauge group SU(2)L×U(1)Y down to the electromagnetic U(1)em. The normalization in Eq. (2.2) is chosen such that v

corresponds to the SM value, i.e. v2 ≡ ∑i 〈χ0i 〉2 = 3(√2 v√6)2 = (√2GF )−1 ' (246 GeV)2. The charged lepton sector is described by the couplings2

−Le = ye ¯̀χeR + yµ ¯̀χµR + yτ ¯̀χτR + h.c. (2.3)

Because of the unbroken Z3 symmetry in the charged lepton sector it is useful to change to

the basis where this symme